ST Alpha - "It depends who you know. Or, more correctly, who you have circled. On Facebook, friending is mutual. On G+ circling is one way" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "Google+ is so irrelevant they find it necessary to email me the "top posts" from recently because no one actually uses it regularly. -- nm" by Qale

It depends who you know. Or, more correctly, who you have circled. On Facebook, friending is mutual. On G+ circling is one way

Posted by TWuG Jan 23 '12, 21:29

like Twitter.

I don't post a lot, but I read a lot on G+

It's better than Facebook and Twitter for following people/subjects you find interesting.

People I know personally don't post much, but I'm finding lots of stuff to be interested in.

Responses:

It doesn't seem to know what it wants to do. If it's great for following people/subjects I find interesting, it's duplicating Twitter, Facebook, and - Qale Jan 23, 21:46 2
- It's better than Twitter (long form versus short form) and the Facebook "subscribe" didn't exist until G+ came along. - TWuG Jan 23, 21:50 1
  - Colin wanted me to use the Hang Out feature more, but he keeps showing me his tits and that's just another huge turn off. -- nm - Qale Jan 23, 21:54

Post a message top

It depends who you know. Or, more correctly, who you have circled. On Facebook, friending is mutual. On G+ circling is one way

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.