ST Alpha - "..." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "never saw it, and still not seeing where the headline disagrees with the story. -- nm" by znufrii

...

Posted by Don Homer (aka DonHomer) Jan 31 '12, 06:13

the person wasn't actually convicted. The jury couldn't agree, so the prosecution is debating whether to retry.

Responses:

not according to the article I read - znufrii Jan 31, 06:15
Re-read. Second to last paragraph indicates he was convicted of simple assault. The story is poorly written, but the headline is correct. -- nm - TWuG Jan 31, 06:14 8
- the *lead* paragraph indicates he was convicted of simple assault. -- nm - znufrii Jan 31, 06:17 5
  - hmm. -- nm - Don Homer Jan 31, 06:21
  - Heh. I got so bogged down in trying to find the issue, I missed that. It's still an atrociously written article. -- nm - TWuG Jan 31, 06:19
  - you are correct. I concede. poorly written nevertheless if others missed what we did. -- nm - the amanda nones Jan 31, 06:19 2
    - I will certainly agree to the point that it's a crappy article nonetheless. -- nm - znufrii Jan 31, 06:20
    - and by "we" I do not mean "you and me." -- nm - the amanda nones Jan 31, 06:20
- oh you're right. the journalism is still crappy. I'm wrong, but because they write *poorly.* -- nm - the amanda nones Jan 31, 06:17 1
  - It is awful. We need Reagen to dissect all the errors made. -- nm - TWuG Jan 31, 06:20

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.