ST Alpha - "I guess I could see that, but you're paying a huge premium (even as the buyer) for an unproven quarterback." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

I guess I could see that, but you're paying a huge premium (even as the buyer) for an unproven quarterback.

Posted by pmb (aka pmb) Feb 1 '12, 14:31

I think he's shown he can be good, but isn't it like the average of the top 7 at that position for salary? That's huge for a guy with basically 1 or 2 starts. Cassel only proves the point.

Responses:

and that's only ok when they've never played a down in the NFL! -- nm - mel kiper Feb 1, 14:57
It's much crazier to let a topflight QB go sans compensation. The Falcons held on to Schaub as long as they could for just this reason. -- nm - David Feb 1, 14:37 4
- Which QB would you rather have now? -- nm - Bacon Feb 1, 14:38 3
  - Between Vick and Schaub? Vick is more dynamic while Schaub has no blood on his hands. So, Schaub. - David Feb 1, 14:40 2
    - Oh, I meant if you could have Matt Ryan or Schaub now. Which would you rather have in that offense? -- nm - Bacon Feb 1, 14:41 1
      - That's a tough question since I think they're both top 10 QBs. I think Ryan is just scratching the surface so I'll say him. -- nm - David Feb 1, 15:27
As long as there are Danial Schnieder types in the league teams will over pay. Al Davis gave up how many first rounders for a QB that hadn't played - Bacon Feb 1, 14:34

Post a message top

I guess I could see that, but you're paying a huge premium (even as the buyer) for an unproven quarterback.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.