ST Alpha - ""Look, we're just requiring the mosques to *serve* pork and whiskey. Nobody's forced to actually consume it. Just make it available. No conflict!" -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

"Look, we're just requiring the mosques to serve pork and whiskey. Nobody's forced to actually consume it. Just make it available. No conflict!" -- nm

Posted by Dr.Vermin (aka Dr.Vermin) Feb 10 '12, 09:51

(No message)

Responses:

Admittedly, I am struggling with this issue and can see both sides. - con_carne Feb 10, 09:59
but, taking this a step further - what if someone Jewish, who keeps a kosher kitchen, started demanding that no meat and milk be served at the same - Andie Feb 10, 09:55 2
- Hmmm. That's an interesting angle. - Dr.Vermin Feb 10, 10:04 1
  - It's not about "whose beliefs are more important". You look at issues like the cost to each party, how those costs could be covered and find a - Roger More Feb 10, 10:16
If this was about requiring a Church to provide insurance coverage to its employees, you'd have a point. It's not. It's about requiring hospitals - TWuG Feb 10, 09:54
[deleted] 2
- But it's almost even more bizarre, because it's not like they are giving out contraceptives. - TFox Feb 10, 10:10 1
  - i see i just made Max's point again. whoops. -- nm - TFox Feb 10, 10:12
I'll take Irrelevant Analogies for $800, Alex. -- nm - ty97 Feb 10, 09:54 1
- i sort of triggered that with my hyperbolic statement on B2 i think. - Andie Feb 10, 10:00
that's a silly (and completely false) illustration of the argument if their ever was one. - znufrii Feb 10, 09:54

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.