Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 155
The contraception compromise says that insurers must provide coverage free of charge to any woman at an affected employer -- (link)
Posted by
TWuG
Feb 10 '12, 11:36
(No message)
http://us.cnn.com/2012/02/10/politics/contraception-controversy/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
(us.cnn.com)
Responses:
[deleted]
1
You're second paragraph (sentence?) is true, and as it should be, but by the same token you can't force a church to perform them.
-
Stephen
Feb 10, 12:11
I don't want to read that, for fear of being stupefied. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Feb 10, 11:41
wait. free coverage? really? what? -- nm
-
the amanda nones
Feb 10, 11:39
19
I thought that was part of the health care law that went into effect back in August.
-
mara
Feb 10, 11:45
1
No, sorry, it will start this August. -- nm
-
mara
Feb 10, 11:46
Free as in "we'll cover your contraceptives as part of your plan without increasing the cost to you" but the contraceptives will still probably have
-
TWuG
Feb 10, 11:42
13
No co-pays. -- (link)
-
mara
Feb 10, 11:46
yeahhhh how is this more okay? -- nm
-
the amanda nones
Feb 10, 11:43
11
You get the same coverage as everyone else at no added cost to you. Or your institution. -- nm
-
TWuG
Feb 10, 11:52
contraceptives are not included in the employer-sponsored health coverage.
-
TFox
Feb 10, 11:46
9
I thought it was actually a really elegant work around. Yes, church, you don't have to pay for it if it offends your religion. But individuals still
-
pmb
Feb 10, 11:51
8
wouldn't that mean that atheists will end up having to pay a little more to cover the added overhead and that is a tactic support of their beliefs?
-
zeitgeist
Feb 10, 12:03
2
copays zeitgeist pays. -- nm
-
TFox
Feb 10, 12:07
1
Sorry, tourette's = not covered -- nm
-
Blue Atheist
Feb 10, 12:08
but that means the world still isn't the way it should be! -- nm
-
the church
Feb 10, 11:56
it is. it's on the backs of the insurers which no one will mind, but the insurers also realize that from a cost perspective this is a non-factor.
-
TFox
Feb 10, 11:52
3
Insurers actually save money by preventing pregnancies. -- nm
-
mara
Feb 10, 11:56
1
that's a less obvious calculation than it seems on its face, but yes in principle. -- nm
-
TFox
Feb 10, 11:58
also, birth control pills are cheaper than babies. -- nm
-
Reagen
Feb 10, 11:56
for generic birth control pills, for this miniscule sliver of insureds, spread over their pool of insured people?
-
TFox
Feb 10, 11:42
The Pope wants you to be sluttier! -- nm
-
oblique
Feb 10, 11:40
1
and a young boy -- nm
-
Beaker
Feb 10, 11:40
No one is going to believe me, but this was the solution I was thinking of. -- nm
-
TFox
Feb 10, 11:37
3
It's not a bad compromise. The women don't get penalized for working for religiously affiliated employers.
-
TWuG
Feb 10, 11:41
[deleted]
1
see?! -- nm
-
TFox
Feb 10, 11:42
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.