Backboards: 
Posts: 155
In response to "I thought it was actually a really elegant work around. Yes, church, you don't have to pay for it if it offends your religion. But individuals still" by pmb

it is. it's on the backs of the insurers which no one will mind, but the insurers also realize that from a cost perspective this is a non-factor.

yes, ultimately these claims are going to get paid for by *someone*, but it's not enough money to move the needle for anyone.

Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.