ST Alpha - "The party is for the bride, not JD. It has to follow the lines she's drawn with the wedding. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 162

In response to "That doesn't mean it has to be JD's problem. If you have two different people inviting two sets of invitees, you are asking for this kind of problem. -- nm" by con_carne

The party is for the bride, not JD. It has to follow the lines she's drawn with the wedding. -- nm

Posted by pmb (aka pmb) Mar 7 '12, 08:15

(No message)

Responses:

[deleted]
This makes no sense. Are you saying all the in-laws and great grandmothers should be invited to the bachelorette party, then? -- nm - con_carne Mar 7, 08:19 5
- This is a job for Venn Diagram Man! - TWuG Mar 7, 08:22 1
  - and not every person at the bachlorette has to be invited to the wedding. - groiny Mar 7, 08:25
- that's not how it works at all. -- nm - loosilu Mar 7, 08:21 1
  - I was being facetious -- nm - con_carne Mar 7, 08:22
- No (although I've seen that happen). I'm saying you can't expand beyond the guest list. You don't have to invite everyone who is on the list though. - pmb Mar 7, 08:21
then she should handle all this herself then. nm -- nm - groiny Mar 7, 08:17 4
- No, but the party is for her. It should be aimed at putting together the people she wants there. -- nm - pmb Mar 7, 08:23 3
  - so, then, she should make a list, and JD is not to veer off that list at all. nm -- nm - groiny Mar 7, 08:24 2
    - That would be fine. Or he can make a list and run it by her. Either is fine. -- nm - pmb Mar 7, 08:31 1
      - Which is what I advised in the first place -- nm - con_carne Mar 7, 08:33

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.