Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 27, 18:07
2: Nov 27, 12:04
3: Nov 27, 08:26
4: Nov 26, 18:06
5: Nov 26, 12:05
6: Nov 26, 08:29
7: Nov 25, 18:33
8: Nov 25, 11:12
9: Nov 25, 07:08
10: Nov 24, 13:17
11: Nov 23, 18:13
12: Nov 23, 06:17
13: Nov 22, 13:24
14: Nov 22, 09:09
15: Nov 21, 22:36
16: Nov 21, 14:03
17: Nov 21, 10:18
18: Nov 21, 07:35
19: Nov 20, 15:19
20: Nov 20, 12:17
Posts: 160
My understanding is that Citizens United struck down sections, not voided entirely
Posted by
Strongbad (aka Rambler14)
Mar 9 '12, 09:43
For example, per Wiki
The ruling did not, as commonly thought, change the amount of money corporations and unions can contribute to campaigns
Responses:
No, but as part of the system, they struck down limits on outside entities as part of speech
-
Will Hunting
Mar 9, 10:16
1
[deleted]
1
If it's a simple as that, yes.
-
Strongbad
Mar 9, 10:13
They don't need to find campaigns directly when they can create their own campaign to influence an election. It's why there are superPACs -- nm
-
Roger More
Mar 9, 10:11
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.