ST Alpha - "so, actually the employer would never know? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 165

In response to "It's not your employer. It's the medical plan." by spamlet

so, actually the employer would never know? -- nm

Posted by loosilu (aka loosilu2) Mar 13 '12, 14:23

(No message)

Responses:

Right - which completely negates the argument being made in the article, -- nm - MojaveMeg Mar 13, 14:30
It says employers can opt out of coverage for contraceptives if they have religious reasons. - spamlet Mar 13, 14:24 10
- I'll try to c&P the actual language - spamlet Mar 13, 14:26 9
  - there's more.. women could have to pay in advance, then submit a claim with proof of a non-pregnancy-related need; and they can be charged a fee. - b. Mar 13, 14:31 5
    - Actually, that's pro-woman. They could just say no contraceptive medicine would be paid for no matter the reason. - spamlet Mar 13, 14:32 3
      - it's pro some women, except for the ridiculousness of the hoop-jumping being required for women with common medical conditions. - b. Mar 13, 14:35
      - ok, explain this - tRuMaN Mar 13, 14:34
      - well, they are. The exception is for a noncontraceptive medicine. -- nm - loosilu Mar 13, 14:33
    - ayup -- nm - tRuMaN Mar 13, 14:32
  - basically, it says an employer must file an affidavid stating its objection to coverage of contraceptives for - tRuMaN Mar 13, 14:29 2
    - Yes and that women can submit proof that the contraception medicine is for non-contraceptive purposes to still get reimbursement. -- nm - spamlet Mar 13, 14:30 1
      - Which is the case in many instances, yes - it can help with acne and other hormone-related issues. -- nm - Beryllium Mar 13, 14:32

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.