|
In response to
"there's more.. women could have to pay in advance, then submit a claim with proof of a non-pregnancy-related need; and they can be charged a fee."
by
b.
|
Actually, that's pro-woman. They could just say no contraceptive medicine would be paid for no matter the reason.
Posted by
spamlet
Mar 13 '12, 14:32
|
Again, I think the bill is stupid but it does nothing like what the link (and apparently the ACLU) says it does.
|
Responses:
|