|
In response to
"Actually, that's pro-woman. They could just say no contraceptive medicine would be paid for no matter the reason."
by
spamlet
|
it's pro some women, except for the ridiculousness of the hoop-jumping being required for women with common medical conditions.
Posted by
b. (aka starrynit)
Mar 13 '12, 14:35
|
it also doesn't take into account the women for whom pregnancy could be life-threatening, etc.
next up: fined for having sex? (not to slippery slope, but so many of the anti-people have intent.)
er, thanks for pointing out the article isn't completely accurate. I, too, usually go look for neutral sources and missed this time.
|