Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 18:10
2: Dec 4, 12:27
3: Dec 4, 09:36
4: Dec 4, 02:38
5: Dec 3, 14:19
6: Dec 3, 11:17
7: Dec 3, 07:33
8: Dec 2, 17:22
9: Dec 2, 11:48
10: Dec 2, 08:21
11: Dec 1, 17:33
12: Dec 1, 11:23
13: Nov 30, 15:54
14: Nov 30, 09:41
15: Nov 29, 16:44
16: Nov 29, 08:01
17: Nov 28, 16:19
18: Nov 28, 09:42
19: Nov 27, 18:07
20: Nov 27, 12:04
Posts: 153
In response to
"
how is this trilogy considered Twilight-esque?
"
by
Diva
It started out as Twilight fanfic, then was changed for publication. -- nm
Posted by
mara
Mar 14 '12, 13:43
(No message)
Responses:
hm - interesting. -- nm
-
Diva
Mar 14, 13:44
7
I think it's interesting that this and that book that's reportedly a thing with UES-type wives are both popular at the same time. this one apparently
-
b.
Mar 14, 13:49
6
see - I thought the 'Beauty' books were pretty boring. -- nm
-
Diva
Mar 14, 13:56
5
*gasp* they were plodding but well written - hell there was no actual sex in most of the 1st one
-
Epiphany
Mar 14, 13:58
4
yep. it was the writing I was referring to, mostly; but the rest is decent enough...
-
b.
Mar 14, 14:16
perhaps I need to revisit. -- nm
-
Diva
Mar 14, 14:00
*makes notes to start with book 2* -- nm
-
Beaker
Mar 14, 13:59
1
this -- nm
-
Diva
Mar 14, 14:00
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
