Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 5, 07:07
2: Dec 4, 18:10
3: Dec 4, 12:27
4: Dec 4, 09:36
5: Dec 4, 02:38
6: Dec 3, 14:19
7: Dec 3, 11:17
8: Dec 3, 07:33
9: Dec 2, 17:22
10: Dec 2, 11:48
11: Dec 2, 08:21
12: Dec 1, 17:33
13: Dec 1, 11:23
14: Nov 30, 15:54
15: Nov 30, 09:41
16: Nov 29, 16:44
17: Nov 29, 08:01
18: Nov 28, 16:19
19: Nov 28, 09:42
20: Nov 27, 18:07
Posts: 163
In response to
"
I'd also argue that even using the term geopolitical foe is dated
"
by
ty97
Here's the full quote - and the context he frames it in is "when we go to the UN on an issue like Syria or North Korea, which permanent members
Posted by
Roger More (aka RogerMore)
Mar 29 '12, 07:17
are the ones most likely to veto?" From that perspective, he has a solid argument.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/mitt-romney-and-russia-geopolitical-foe-at-the-un/2012/03/27/gIQATzCneS_blog.html
(www.washingtonpost.com)
Responses:
[deleted]
I disagree with his rhetoric. I think he has some valid points. I think in many respects Russia has taken several steps backwards in the last few
-
pmb
Mar 29, 07:30
1
I don't think we view Russia as a friendly nation...
-
Mel Profit
Mar 29, 07:46
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.