Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 14:43
2: Dec 11, 11:29
3: Dec 11, 07:59
4: Dec 10, 18:15
5: Dec 10, 12:28
6: Dec 10, 09:30
7: Dec 10, 05:59
8: Dec 9, 17:07
9: Dec 9, 13:47
10: Dec 9, 10:33
11: Dec 9, 07:33
12: Dec 8, 17:50
13: Dec 8, 10:32
14: Dec 8, 06:23
15: Dec 7, 16:52
16: Dec 7, 07:17
17: Dec 6, 14:40
18: Dec 6, 10:07
19: Dec 6, 07:32
20: Dec 5, 19:48
Posts: 152
In response to
"
Rick Santorum has done it now. During a speech he almost let loose the "n-word" and tried to cover it up. -- (link)
"
by
MDH
ooops. -- nm
Posted by
znufrii
Mar 30 '12, 06:30
(No message)
Responses:
Didn't seem like it to me. Seemed like he was going for something like "anti government beatnik" and said "anti government-nik" or whatever -- nm
-
rollo
Mar 30, 06:49
5
"the anti-war government n*****" doesn't make a whole lot of sense. -- nm
-
Ender
Mar 30, 06:51
4
I wouldn't say the alternative makes much sense either, but I'll allow the possibility of him stumbling over a poorly-constructed turn of phrase. -- nm
-
znufrii
Mar 30, 07:16
Unless he was going for "nincompoop". -- nm
-
Beryllium
Mar 30, 06:56
2
The problem is he doesn't just start the phrase over and get it right ("it" being whatever it was he's trying to say).
-
mara
Mar 30, 06:59
1
Right, that is the problem right there. I don't necessary think he was going to say the "n" word, but he doesn't help himself with his reaction at all -- nm
-
Kim Pine
Mar 30, 07:04
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.