Backboards: 
Posts: 155

You can't be serious.

He is without a doubt saying that the Court would be guilty of judicial activism if they overturned the healthcare law. I'm not sure how this is even a point of debate.

"I�m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.  And I'd just remind conservative commentators that for years what we�ve heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint -- that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law.  Well, this is a good example.  And I�m pretty confident that this Court will recognize that and not take that step."


Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.