Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 11:48
2: Dec 2, 08:21
3: Dec 1, 17:33
4: Dec 1, 11:23
5: Nov 30, 15:54
6: Nov 30, 09:41
7: Nov 29, 16:44
8: Nov 29, 08:01
9: Nov 28, 16:19
10: Nov 28, 09:42
11: Nov 27, 18:07
12: Nov 27, 12:04
13: Nov 27, 08:26
14: Nov 26, 18:06
15: Nov 26, 12:05
16: Nov 26, 08:29
17: Nov 25, 18:33
18: Nov 25, 11:12
19: Nov 25, 07:08
20: Nov 24, 13:17
Posts: 165
In response to
"
His criticism of it is in the same paragraph as his embrace of it is. -- nm
"
by
Stephen, loving the Lady Irish!
(Also, as someone who taught Constitutional Law, he should know that just because a law was "duly constituted and passes" by a "strong majority"
Posted by
Stephen, loving the Lady Irish! (aka Sceire)
Apr 3 '12, 10:59
doesn't mean the law is constitutional.
It just seems like such an odd argument to make, and I can't see how it helps him in any way.
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.