Backboards: 
Posts: 162

David.......

because I should not HAVE to use the ignore.

Here is what I see, and you can call it seeing it through tainted glasses if you like, I can see why you would.....

I see the same pattern, loosi offending someone, and a flock of defenders swooping in to dismiss what she said as "non-offensive" and accuse someone of being "overly - sensitive". This time, it was not me, or Spawn, or Jim, or Dawson. It was max, who for all intents and purposes, was minding his own business. So he got drive-by shived, which happens all the time. Except maybe the person who shived him should have used another name? Maybe they are not on grounds to shiv each other? I do not know. What I do know is that someone I call a friend was insulted (rightly or wrongly is debateable) and dismissed.

It is no secret that you , reagen and znufrii, and CY to an extent, are defenders of her. You have your reasons, I am sure. But in the same way that Spawn and I draw the ire of you guys, you guys draw our ire when you defend her when she is obviously wrong enough to feel the need to send him an apology email.

I am just being honest. And I think you know that I respect your opinion a great deal.


Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.