ST Alpha - "I think even in your 30s that waiting a month or two is probably not beneficial." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

I think even in your 30s that waiting a month or two is probably not beneficial.

Posted by Inigo (aka Inigo) Apr 18 '12, 09:44

When you meet someone you connect with, the two of you will want to be around each other constantly, and the attraction will lead to something physical quickly.

If you don't have that crazy mental and physical attraction, you can probably wait a few months. But the reason you can wait is that you're probably not that into the other person that much, imo.

Responses:

I tend to know fairly soon whether I'm going to sleep with someone, once I've figured that out the specifics of the timeframe are less concerning. -- nm - mafic Apr 18, 10:04 3
- it would have to be pretty bad for me to give it a "no" vote. - groiny Apr 18, 10:07 2
  - what if they can eat more than you but have a really high metabolism so they are skinny? -- nm - Topper Apr 18, 10:12 1
    - then it's even worse. -- nm - znufrii Apr 18, 10:24
[deleted] 2
- ie., do you have the same kinky fetishes? -- nm - Don Homer Apr 18, 09:50 1
  - bacon lube? -- nm - sycor Apr 18, 09:52
I guess I didn't think of that way. Most of the girls I dated were co-workers or I knew them from school. So the getting to know each other was slower - sycor Apr 18, 09:48
That was part of my point about date frequency. -- nm - Iron Spawn Apr 18, 09:46 1
- Yeah, my post was kind of an offshoot of yours. -- nm - Inigo Apr 18, 09:47

Post a message top

I think even in your 30s that waiting a month or two is probably not beneficial.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.