Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 158
In response to
"
allocations of revenue in a bill that are directed to a specific project or recipient typically in a legislator�s home state or district -- nm
"
by
Strongbad the Belittler
Considering that this bill is specifically looking for state and local project to fund, you should probably take issue with the whole bill then.
Posted by
ty97
Jan 27 '09, 06:38
Since it's one big earmark to you
Responses:
All I'm doing is holding Obama to his "no earmark" policy.
-
Strongbad the Belittler
Jan 27, 06:42
1
And to be 100% accurate, I'm not holding Obama to it. Yet.
-
Strongbad the Belittler
Jan 27, 06:44
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.