Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 164
yikes. I see the buzz regarding The Hobbit footage that was shown, was not positive at all. -- nm
Posted by
Jovian (aka Jovian)
Apr 25 '12, 08:09
(No message)
Responses:
where is this footage? -- nm
-
Mel Profit
Apr 25, 08:34
And if audiences really don't like it, they can fix it by just playing it half as fast. -- nm
-
Reagen
Apr 25, 08:24
2
Supposedly the studio is saying that both 24 fps and 48 fps versions will be hitting theaters?
-
TFox
Apr 25, 08:32
1
it would have to since only a few theatres will be prepared for 48.
-
zork
Apr 25, 08:36
I've only seen positive. -- nm
-
Roger More
Apr 25, 08:22
some was, some wasnt. a lot of what i read is that it looked too
-
tRuMaN, (not a knock off version)
Apr 25, 08:11
22
the buzz that is bad, is *really* bad. If critics are bitching about the frame rates, the audience is going to loathe it. -- nm
-
Jovian
Apr 25, 08:12
21
Oh, it's 30fps? -- nm
-
Beryllium
Apr 25, 08:15
5
48 -- nm
-
tRuMaN, (not a knock off version)
Apr 25, 08:15
4
I've always said that 30fps seemed to lack gravitas ... 48 must be like helium. But if any movie can bring gravitas in another way, it would be that -- nm
-
Beryllium
Apr 25, 08:25
2
isn't 30 fps television and 24 is film? or am I misremembering? -- nm
-
zork
Apr 25, 08:33
8 fps is more than enough! -- nm
-
Hiroshi Sasagawa
Apr 25, 08:27
there was a link yesterday about how this movie will change ... movies. -- nm
-
zork
Apr 25, 08:16
I think critics are like baseball writers and hate change. They want their movies to look like movies. -- nm
-
zork
Apr 25, 08:14
14
So does your average movie goer. I know I certainly do -- nm
-
Jovian
Apr 25, 08:15
12
High frame rates make stuff look like it was shot on security cameras -- nm
-
con_carne
Apr 25, 08:35
6
But if you compensate for the effect with good lighting, familiar angles, and stellar cinematography - it might overcome that effect. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Apr 25, 08:37
you can't recognise anyone in the picture? -- nm
-
zork
Apr 25, 08:37
why is that? I thought high frame rates would look better. -- nm
-
loosilu
Apr 25, 08:37
3
Uncanny smoothness
-
con_carne
Apr 25, 08:43
The best DVD example I've seen in favour of 30fps+ is the opening credits to Nic Cage's gone in 60 seconds -- nm
-
Beryllium
Apr 25, 08:40
too smooth, no flicker apparently. -- nm
-
zork
Apr 25, 08:38
I disagree. The Average movie goer has no idea what you are talking about -- nm
-
Beaker
Apr 25, 08:26
3
The average moviegoer has a brain that tells them "omg what are my eyes seeing?". Whether that is good or bad remains to be seen.
-
Beryllium
Apr 25, 08:29
1
I have a feeling it will dowl people over in an Avatar way. If not, they can drop half the frames and show it at 24fps. -- nm
-
zork
Apr 25, 08:35
"WTH? This looks like video, not film." -- nm
-
TWuG
Apr 25, 08:28
for me, it would depend on the subject, genre, etc. I'm certainly not against 48 and if all going forward were that, I'm ok. -- nm
-
zork
Apr 25, 08:18
agreed -- nm
-
Beaker
Apr 25, 08:14
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.