end of life poll: if you were diagnosed with cancer, would you opt for aggressive chemo/drug treatment, or quality of life in the time you had left? -- nm
Posted by
pixitude (aka chris)
May 1 '12, 11:46
|
(No message)
|
Responses:
-
It depends. I don't want to live in pain or miserable though. -- nm
-
Don Homer
May 1, 12:10
-
Bill was in his late 20s when he was told he had 3 months but they could probably get him into a research program.
-
MojaveMeg
May 1, 11:56
3
-
Long walk off a short pier
-
zeitgeist
May 1, 11:55
3
-
Pump me full of everything you got and SAVE MY ASS -- nm
-
con_carne
May 1, 11:50
1
-
Fight that bitch. From hell's heart, I stab at thee. For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at thee. -- nm
-
Iron Spawn
May 1, 11:49
-
generally speaking, quality of life takes priority for me.
-
znufrii
May 1, 11:49
7
-
I'm a fighter, so I'd fight the son of a bitch until one of us was dead -- nm
-
CQ
May 1, 11:48
1
- [deleted]
2
-
Is it terminal? Like, would the treatment only give me a couple more months? -- nm
-
sycor
May 1, 11:47
-
it totally depends on the cancer, and how progressed it is. -- nm
-
Andie
May 1, 11:46
11
-
this nurse's situation inspired the question. 18 months ago she was diagnosed with terminal breast cancer -- (link)
-
pixitude
May 1, 11:50
10
-
and now that I'm reading down the column, she is undergoing treatment, just not the "throw everything at it" variety.
-
b.
May 1, 12:11
-
IBC 5-year survival rate is ~25-50%, which, while sucky, isn't that bad* compared to some other cancers.
-
b.
May 1, 12:02
7
-
Inflammatory breast cancer, which gives a 40% chance to live five years, and in her case had spread to the spine.
-
Roger More
May 1, 11:58
-
not answering this question until I have to. -- nm
-
Mel Profit
May 1, 11:46
|
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
|
|