ST Alpha - "meh. If they didn't want their information intercepted they should have locked down their network. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 160

In response to "Did we know about this and I missed it? FCC reports that Google used StreetView vehicles to snoop on unlocked WiFi routers. -- (link)" by loosilu

meh. If they didn't want their information intercepted they should have locked down their network. -- nm

Posted by sycor May 2 '12, 07:37

(No message)

Responses:

also this. I have no pity or expectation of privacy for people that use unencrypted wifi -- nm - oblique May 2, 07:40 8
- I think there's still an expectation of privacy. A burglar is still committing a crime, even if you left your front door open. -- nm - Roger More May 2, 07:49 6
  - Unencrypted WiFi is like taking your valuables and putting them on the sidewalk and trusting no one to take them. -- nm - TWuG May 2, 08:01 1
    - I totally agree. But if someone does take them, it's still theft. I'm not saying the person isn't an idiot, I'm saying it's still wrong. -- nm - Roger More May 2, 08:03
  - I have a hard time applying that analogy because you are broadcasting that outside the walls of your home. Do you have protection from ludeness or - oblique May 2, 07:52 3
    - Indecent exposure isn't a property crime. - Roger More May 2, 07:58 2
      - Yeah, I don't buy that. If I collect the same information sitting at a hotspot at Starbucks, there is no crime - oblique May 2, 08:01 1
        
        There's still an invasion of your rights though. -- nm - Roger More May 2, 08:04
- oh yeah, totally agree. -- nm - loosilu May 2, 07:40

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.