ST Alpha - "No, they're not all equal. When it's clear, like the idiot admitting he did it on purpose, there should be a long term suspension." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "the only reason he got suspended at all was cause he opened his mouth. Pitches get away all the time, should every hit batter equal a suspension? -- nm" by Beaker

No, they're not all equal. When it's clear, like the idiot admitting he did it on purpose, there should be a long term suspension.

Posted by Krusty (aka krustylu) May 8 '12, 09:15

I understand that it'll more often than not come down to someone deciding if it was intentionally or accidentally but we all know when we see it whether it was intentional or not.
Sometimes they make it obvious and sometimes they don't. But in the end when you have someone admitting they did it for no reason you have to suspend him for more than one start. You can't allow to do this without any real punishment.

Responses:

A longer suspension will only hurt the team - not Hamels. He still gets paid - decline May 8, 09:17 1
- Right. And the team will be sure to tell their pitchers not to do it if they're going to lose them for three starts. -- nm - Krusty May 8, 09:19

Post a message top

No, they're not all equal. When it's clear, like the idiot admitting he did it on purpose, there should be a long term suspension.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.