|
In response to
"I think the point is more decrying the need for it to be 'recognized' by anyone. -- nm"
by
Dr.Vermin
|
no, i get his point. this is just an aside.. for insurance, tax, etc reasons, there has to be a system by which i am legally coupled.. why is it a
Posted by
colin (aka colinski)
May 11 '12, 13:59
|
state issue, not federal?
we can get in to the "should marriage or civil unions matter" discussion, but lets go on the basis that a lot of our legal systems rely on it in some way and discuss why it's left up to states.
|
Responses:
|