Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 12, 08:55
2: Dec 11, 23:59
3: Dec 11, 14:43
4: Dec 11, 11:29
5: Dec 11, 07:59
6: Dec 10, 18:15
7: Dec 10, 12:28
8: Dec 10, 09:30
9: Dec 10, 05:59
10: Dec 9, 17:07
11: Dec 9, 13:47
12: Dec 9, 10:33
13: Dec 9, 07:33
14: Dec 8, 17:50
15: Dec 8, 10:32
16: Dec 8, 06:23
17: Dec 7, 16:52
18: Dec 7, 07:17
19: Dec 6, 14:40
20: Dec 6, 10:07
Posts: 152
AT&T's text messages cost $1,310 per megabyte... -- (link)
Posted by
Don Homer (aka DonHomer)
May 14 '12, 08:52
(No message)
link
(techcrunch.com)
Responses:
that's just for the message data. if you include the other data included (destination, sender, etc.) it would be less. -- nm
-
zork
May 14, 08:58
2
eh, not too much. message headers on sms are tiny -- nm
-
decline
May 14, 08:59
1
still when you are basing on 160 bytes, even an extra 20 characters (10 digit phone for sender and receiver) changes the amount by 12.5% -- nm
-
zork
May 14, 09:10
That's a 4 year old link. -- nm
-
TWuG
May 14, 08:54
6
Sorry. It was linked somewhere else, and found it interesting. *shrug* -- nm
-
Don Homer
May 14, 09:00
1
It is interesting, but is it still relevant? Is AT&T still charging for texts like that? -- nm
-
TWuG
May 14, 09:02
but it's trending now -- nm
-
decline
May 14, 08:55
3
but is it still breastfeeding? -- nm
-
zork
May 14, 10:03
Because people are just catching up with 4 year old news? -- nm
-
TWuG
May 14, 08:56
1
Damnit, Mop -- nm
-
oblique
May 14, 08:57
Not bad for an out-of-band signal hack -- nm
-
Beryllium
May 14, 08:53
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.