Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 162
Supreme Court limits protection against "Double Jeopardy"
Posted by
amoxy (aka amoxy)
May 29 '12, 09:00
ST Lawyers, is this a narrow ruling on just this case or will it weaken the double jeopardy protection?
6-3 interesting the 3 women voted against it
(www.latimes.com)
Responses:
first Missing is cancelled and now this.
-
Beaker
May 29, 09:09
1
She was fine this Sunday on TV. I kept yelling for the cameraman to pan away. -- nm
-
MDH
May 29, 09:09
so no two episodes in a row of the show in the future? -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
May 29, 09:08
[deleted]
They can't all be Ashley Judd fans. -- nm
-
Roger More
May 29, 09:02
huh, I would have thought they could go after him for the manslaughter but that murder one would be off the table. -- nm
-
Beaker
May 29, 09:02
2
An email list I'm on discussed this at length. The decision seems to hinge on the Judge not filing the verdict on the two charges of acquittal, but,
-
TWuG
May 29, 09:06
1
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.