Backboards: 
Posts: 153
In response to "Hi Amanda! :) good to see you - for the John McQueary testimony did you mean this?" by JenBro

It seems so odd that the father testified. It seems very "hearsayish". Not sure where it would fit in the exceptions. But when you have the direct

testimony, why would you go with somebody else saying what that person said from a prosecution standpoint? It can only create inconsistencies.

Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.