ST Alpha - "I'm not saying the article is invalid - I'm pointing out that it is not saying "Oh, we are just reverting to the mean" -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "The article is valid, and raises several other points that JackDawson mentioned." by Strongbad

I'm not saying the article is invalid - I'm pointing out that it is not saying "Oh, we are just reverting to the mean" -- nm

Posted by Roger More (aka Rogermore) Jun 26 '12, 05:31

(No message)

Responses:

To me, the primary conclusions are - Strongbad Jun 26, 05:39 7
- But the discussion stems from your comment that the rightward shift balances out the leftward shift from 1950-75, which implies that this is no big - Roger More Jun 26, 05:45 5
  - I shouldn't have used the word "balances" - Strongbad Jun 26, 05:53 4
    - Doubtless the court did need some rebalancing after Warren (but not a backlash) The two things that worry me about that article are that at the - Roger More Jun 26, 06:06 3
      - Diversity in views is important, I agree. - Strongbad Jun 26, 06:32 2
        
        If the most extreme liberal is actually a centrist, it's a conservative court. - Roger More Jun 26, 07:29 1
        
        I disagree. - Strongbad Jun 26, 08:04
- [deleted]

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.