Am I right in believing that Congress will indirectly control the cost of the insurance mandate by virtue of controlling the tax?
Posted by
Fuzzy (aka mrfuzzy)
Jun 28 '12, 07:47
|
In other words, if people are weighing the cost of paying the tax versus the cost of paying for the insurance, there is a point at which paying the tax is more cost-effective for them. That should in turn place a measure of control on the insurance cost through simple market forces. Right?
|
Responses:
|