Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 158
I don't think I would have picked that split was feasible.
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz)
Jun 28 '12, 08:24
Roberts being the defacto swing vote was not something I thought was possible.
Responses:
would've been a hell of a bet on intrade, if they offered it -- nm
-
znufrii
Jun 28, 08:26
1
I think there was money in betting that it would be upheld, though. -- nm
-
Tim
Jun 28, 08:27
[deleted]
9
Thanks, Georgie! -- nm
-
Obama si
Jun 28, 08:26
8
I wonder how long till we start seeing effigies of the traitor Roberts being burned. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Jun 28, 08:29
7
[deleted]
6
Also, from a standpoint of how Obama and his team sold this; how fortunate are they that the majority didn't listen to them?
-
Will Hunting
Jun 28, 08:35
5
[deleted]
[deleted]
3
Okay, an article I saw said they tilted away from that interpretation ...
-
Will Hunting
Jun 28, 08:38
2
[deleted]
publicly they did, I believe, yes. -- nm
-
Don Homer
Jun 28, 08:39
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
