Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 161
'Bad Bank' Plan Has Pitfalls, Analysts Say -- (link)
Posted by
Loyola
Jan 29 '09, 14:35
(No message)
Shocker
(www.thestreet.com)
Responses:
first reaction: If the government pays at or slightly above market value, even with the inevitable capital hit...
-
TFox
Jan 29, 14:37
6
I'm guessing the banks offload all their counter party risk in CDS's to a bad bank. Potential liabilities of trillions foisted onto the public
-
Loyola
Jan 29, 14:41
4
I'm not an economyologist, but given the choices available, I don't hate it. And neither did the folks at the Economist, for that matter. -- nm
-
TFox
Jan 29, 14:43
3
I guess we can agree, whatever happens, the American taxpayer's future liabilities will increase. -- nm
-
Loyola
Jan 29, 14:48
2
but we knew that anyway... :) -- nm
-
znufrii
Jan 29, 14:48
1
*earmarks znufrii* -- nm
-
Loyola
Jan 29, 14:49
If a gov't "bad bank" pays a premium for these mortgages, I'm going down to D.C. and cutting off someone's balls. -- nm
-
Mop
Jan 29, 14:41
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
