Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 08:21
2: Dec 1, 17:33
3: Dec 1, 11:23
4: Nov 30, 15:54
5: Nov 30, 09:41
6: Nov 29, 16:44
7: Nov 29, 08:01
8: Nov 28, 16:19
9: Nov 28, 09:42
10: Nov 27, 18:07
11: Nov 27, 12:04
12: Nov 27, 08:26
13: Nov 26, 18:06
14: Nov 26, 12:05
15: Nov 26, 08:29
16: Nov 25, 18:33
17: Nov 25, 11:12
18: Nov 25, 07:08
19: Nov 24, 13:17
20: Nov 23, 18:13
Posts: 161
In response to
"
I'm not bashing art. But in general, if private society truly benefits from something, then private society will pay for it.
"
by
Dr.Vermin
which is nice if you can calculate the precise economic value of art. -- nm
Posted by
Reagen (aka Reagen)
Jan 29 '09, 14:55
(No message)
Responses:
Maybe in difficult times, things whose value cannot be calculated *should* drop a few notches on the priority list.
-
Dr.Vermin
Jan 29, 15:04
4
Maybe. But isn't the question about arts funding in general?
-
Reagen
Jan 29, 15:07
just out of curiosity - where do the $18 billion in Wall Street bonuses fall in the priority list? -- nm
-
Guy
Jan 29, 15:05
1
Bzzzt. Topic switcher.
-
Dr.Vermin
Jan 29, 15:07
I probably wouldn't notice the $100 over the long run. I would however notice the sculpture. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jan 29, 15:05
which is exactly how corporations approach it, as a marketing expernse, weighing the cost of their support against the value of their name being every
-
znufrii
Jan 29, 14:59
1
One of the more exciting new areas in arts funding advocacy is in developing the idea of a creative economy
-
Harry Lime
Jan 29, 15:03
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
