Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 11:48
2: Dec 2, 08:21
3: Dec 1, 17:33
4: Dec 1, 11:23
5: Nov 30, 15:54
6: Nov 30, 09:41
7: Nov 29, 16:44
8: Nov 29, 08:01
9: Nov 28, 16:19
10: Nov 28, 09:42
11: Nov 27, 18:07
12: Nov 27, 12:04
13: Nov 27, 08:26
14: Nov 26, 18:06
15: Nov 26, 12:05
16: Nov 26, 08:29
17: Nov 25, 18:33
18: Nov 25, 11:12
19: Nov 25, 07:08
20: Nov 24, 13:17
Posts: 154
In response to
"
just wondering what the basis would be. -- nm
"
by
loosilu
Covering up criminal activity that allowed future victims to be assaulted?
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz)
Jul 14 '12, 10:18
This should not be hard to find a basis?
Responses:
I didn't know this was a thing you could sue for. Believe me, I want to see it. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 14, 10:29
3
This is the same type of lawsuit that previous molestees brought against individual priests, archbishops, and the Catholic church. Most of them were
-
Trish
Jul 14, 11:16
2
the parallels are quite strong, aren't they? -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 14, 12:03
1
Yeah. The bishops and Archbishops covered for the individual priests and the Church as its own entity covered for them. -- nm
-
Trish
Jul 14, 12:20
this. -- nm
-
Remlik
Jul 14, 10:20
1
That Monsignor in Phila was recently jailed for this. -- nm
-
Amanda
Jul 14, 10:29
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.