Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 08:21
2: Dec 1, 17:33
3: Dec 1, 11:23
4: Nov 30, 15:54
5: Nov 30, 09:41
6: Nov 29, 16:44
7: Nov 29, 08:01
8: Nov 28, 16:19
9: Nov 28, 09:42
10: Nov 27, 18:07
11: Nov 27, 12:04
12: Nov 27, 08:26
13: Nov 26, 18:06
14: Nov 26, 12:05
15: Nov 26, 08:29
16: Nov 25, 18:33
17: Nov 25, 11:12
18: Nov 25, 07:08
19: Nov 24, 13:17
20: Nov 23, 18:13
Posts: 157
Reading B2 and laughing at Reagen's post about Ohio. Rail only works in densely
Posted by
TWuG
Jan 29 '09, 16:23
populated areas and between densely populated areas.
Rail in Ohio would likely connect the 3 Cs, Dayton and Toledo.
Leaving out most of Southwest and Northeast Ohio. Those areas are just not populated densely enough to warrant it.
Responses:
Should make clear that I agree with his point. And even in a small area (relative), rail can lack the efficiencies that Europe gets. -- nm
-
TWuG
Jan 29, 16:27
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.