ST Alpha - "Is it the doctor's choice? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

In response to "One that shouldn't have a license. -- nm" by TWuG

Is it the doctor's choice? -- nm

Posted by Amy (aka momstravaganza) Jan 30 '09, 06:40

(No message)

Responses:

Absolutely. In vitro is elective. A doc has no obligation to provide it. And in this case it could be argued - TWuG Jan 30, 06:56 2
- well, with 8 babies, this couldn't be in vitro. it would have to be meds. Of course, that is elective as well. -- nm - loosilu Jan 30, 07:02
- My aunt's doctor refused to do a second round of in vitro on her because he believed that it would be unsuccessful. -- nm - kelly Jan 30, 07:00
Having gone the fertility route they have control. - AJRimmer Jan 30, 06:54 6
- I'm totally anti big families (and I'm from one) but I feel hinky regulating family size. (more) - Amy Jan 30, 07:21 1
  - I agree 100% with your IM. it's the medical intervention part I'm squeamish about. she had six - loosilu Jan 30, 07:23
- with six previous kids, an ethical doc should have flat out refused. -- nm - loosilu Jan 30, 06:56 3
  - with six previous kids, he should have tied her effin tubes! -- nm - CQ Jan 30, 07:16 2
    - I guess my mom shouldn't have had me, then. -- nm - Amy Jan 30, 07:22
    - quiverful. -- nm - loosilu Jan 30, 07:17
of course. Assuming he/she has all the info. -- nm - loosilu Jan 30, 06:42
"This week on Private Practice..." -- nm - oblique, eighth best slackertalker Jan 30, 06:41

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.