Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 154
color portraits of celebrities from the 40s (reagan, what's your opinion on the old three-strip technicolor process?) -- (link)
Posted by
the human tater tot (aka chris)
Jul 19 '12, 14:23
(No message)
digital color always seems to be more vibrant than actual real life. technicolor is warmer but i don't know if its fidelity to "real" color is any greater
(www.salon.com)
Responses:
I don't know that I have one specifically, though in general I don't think digital has been able to reproduce the saturation you see in old film stock
-
Reagen
Jul 19, 14:25
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.