ST Alpha - "This crossed my mind yesterday: If you could go back in time and save Cobain, knowing that there would be no Foo Fighters... would you? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "Why? Cobain would be 44. -- nm" by spamlet

This crossed my mind yesterday: If you could go back in time and save Cobain, knowing that there would be no Foo Fighters... would you? -- nm

Posted by Mop (199 lbs) (aka rburriel) Jul 26 '12, 09:36

(No message)

Responses:

no - he has to go. I need the Foo -- nm - Epiphany Jul 26, 09:43 4
- Next to killing Hitler, saving Cobain is the top issue that the Time Travel Authority has to deal with. -- nm - Mop (199 lbs) Jul 26, 09:52
- The first couple albums alone far exceed anything Nirvana ever put out, IMO -- nm - con_carne Jul 26, 09:45 2
  - I recognize that Nirvana was a leader in a musical movement but I agree with you all the same. - Epiphany Jul 26, 09:47 1
    - Nirvana is queso fresco, Foos are aged cheddar. Both are great. One is just finer and goes down better. -- nm - con_carne Jul 26, 09:54
Would there really have been no Foo Fighters if Cobain had lived, tho? I'm thinking Dave Grohl would've eventually lit out on his own either way. - miffed67 Jul 26, 09:38 4
- If Cobain lives, Foo Fighters are to Nirvana as Wings are to the Beatles. - Mop (199 lbs) Jul 26, 09:41 2
  - Yeah, I get that, but he's free to say, "when pigs fly" too. Lots of bands have done it. -- nm - miffed67 Jul 26, 09:50
  - If we are allowing non change in singer, I go with The Police and Sting. -- nm - The Dark Spawn Jul 26, 09:43
- Exactly. -- nm - The Dark Spawn Jul 26, 09:38

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.