Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 154
In response to
"
NYT just spoiled women's gymnastics in a news alert. -- nm
"
by
loosilu
So did MSN and Fox Sports and Yahoo -- nm
Posted by
eag (aka eag)
Jul 31 '12, 10:49
(No message)
Responses:
And now that we know all these sources reported it, we can pretty much guess which team won -- nm
-
con_carne
Jul 31, 11:03
It's almost like it's news. -- nm
-
Ender
Jul 31, 10:50
40
my local news radio station had a whole story about people going to great lengths not to be spoiled. NYT could have kept it out of the subject line
-
loosilu
Jul 31, 10:57
29
Maybe one of those great lengths should have been not looking at an e-mail box you get news alerts to... *NM*
-
Ender
Jul 31, 11:00
1
I can avoid social media and news sites. I do'nt get alerts THAT often so it didn't occur to me. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 31, 11:00
how is that in any way an obligation of the NYTimes?
-
znufrii
Jul 31, 10:58
26
It's news sure but it's info that could have been prefaced with a subject header warning that the email contained spoilers for an even that
-
Krusty
Jul 31, 11:06
19
Well, the NYT does have an interest in tweaking NBC's nose... -- nm
-
Ender
Jul 31, 11:08
it could have been, sure, but there is absolutely no reason to expect they should, or would. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 31, 11:08
16
I expect them to not ruin the outcome of a sports event most people couldn't watch live.
-
Krusty
Jul 31, 11:12
9
that most people couldn't watch it live is no fault of theirs. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 31, 11:14
8
*facepalm* -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 31, 11:18
Come on! They know that their readers can't watch and are likely waiting to watch it tonight.
-
Krusty
Jul 31, 11:18
6
It's the Michael Bolton attitude. "Why should I change? NBC's the one who sucks" -- nm
-
Roger More
Jul 31, 11:21
why would they assume that? For all they know, their readers are following their live blog coverage or streaming it online. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 31, 11:21
2
Right. Their audience is at work.
-
Krusty
Jul 31, 11:25
and the ones who AREN"T doing that don't need an alert! -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 31, 11:21
even our news radio is giving spoiler warnings! -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 31, 11:19
1
Yup. I listen to 880 CBS and they warn us before giving out scores/results.
-
Krusty
Jul 31, 11:21
I expect them to be considerate of their readers. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 31, 11:09
5
correct. and their presumption must be that their readers want to be informed of the news, otherwise, why would they be reading? -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 31, 11:10
4
If I wanted to see the news, I would go to their site. I do not want them sending me a
-
loosilu
Jul 31, 11:19
1
then don't sign up for email updates. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 31, 11:21
"Spoilers" in the subject line. I can not imagine this is hard to do! -- nm
-
The Dark Spawn
Jul 31, 11:12
1
Seriously!?! Are they new to tape delay in sports? -- nm
-
Krusty
Jul 31, 11:16
*event* not even -- nm
-
Krusty
Jul 31, 11:07
and if you don't want potential spoilers from their email updates, unsubscribe. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 31, 11:00
4
You are proving loosi's point though. One would think sending emails that encourage people to unsubscribe is not in NYT's best interest. -- nm
-
con_carne
Jul 31, 11:02
2
It's not encouraging them to unsubscribe. It's encouraging them to get the news first. (Also re b2)
-
Roger More
Jul 31, 11:06
correct. they send spoilers all the time for prime time events. that's totally not a problem. this one just annoyed me. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 31, 11:05
this is the first one they've sent this olympics. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jul 31, 11:01
yeah, i agree. -- nm
-
Andie
Jul 31, 10:59
I could understand if it was a live sports event.
-
ty97
Jul 31, 10:52
Yup. -- nm
-
mara
Jul 31, 10:51
2
Clearly NBC should have rotated the Earth 1/3 of the way around so this would be primetime. -- nm
-
Ender
Jul 31, 10:53
1
Don't make us ban you. -- nm
-
Twitter
Jul 31, 11:05
this is america, it's not real until we see it on tv. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 31, 10:51
5
do you guys not get it live on any channel at all? (other than online) -- nm
-
Andie
Jul 31, 10:53
4
The only TV airing will be in primetime -- nm
-
ty97
Jul 31, 10:57
Across 8 channels we get over 90 hours of coverage a day, but I'm not sure if the stuff saved for primetime is on TV live. -- nm
-
Ender
Jul 31, 10:54
1
ah. -- nm
-
Andie
Jul 31, 10:55
no idea. I don't care enough to try and watch it. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 31, 10:54
And Rob Lowe -- nm
-
eag
Jul 31, 10:50
1
ha! -- nm
-
Epiphany
Jul 31, 11:07
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.