ST Alpha - "Didn't the Supreme Court say (which they never do) that the Gore/Bush decision was for those circumstances alone? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 150

In response to "And so it begins: Norm Coleman's lawyers argue that Bush v. Gore should be used as precedent. (linky)" by ReluctantCynic

Didn't the Supreme Court say (which they never do) that the Gore/Bush decision was for those circumstances alone? -- nm

Posted by Cuzzin Todd (aka cuzzintodd) Jan 31 '09, 17:10

(No message)

Responses:

[deleted] 1
- I only know from what I saw in Recount when they pointed it out. ;) -- nm - Cuzzin Todd Jan 31, 17:40

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.