Belle's contract was very fair -- Crawford's was bewildering.
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz)
Aug 18 '12, 12:39
|
You quote year prior...
Let's look at trailing 4 years.
Belle 6.6, 5.4, 1.2 (odd calc), 6.7
CC -- 3.7, 2.3, 4.7, 6.6
Totals Belle (19.9) CC (17.3)
And that 1.2 is bewildering given the 116 OPS Belle put up. Crawford's WAR is seemingly based on speed which wasn't going to improve at age 30 onward.
Belle was a bad result, Crawford was a bad contract.
|