Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 150
In response to
"
be that as it may, that's not the argument that's being made here. -- nm
"
by
znufrii
I was responding to wrong element's assertion, with which you agreed.
Posted by
spamlet
Aug 21 '12, 07:02
If you are asserting the reason for the argument, you can't just say that evidence to the contrary is not part of the argument being made. You've been hanging around Dawson too long.
Responses:
it was an accurate observation, fwiw, but doesn't speak to my issues with the specific policy being discussed.
-
znufrii
Aug 21, 07:17
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.