|
In response to
"is that still true (each state has 1+)? -- nm"
by
Don Homer
|
There was a thing about a state with 1 provider and a new law that would probably force it to close
Posted by
TWuG
Aug 21 '12, 11:35
|
IIRC, in the context of the storyt, each state had at least 1 provider and if this state succeeded in closing its only provider, it would be the first state with no provider at all.
Last I heard, a state judge delayed the implementation of the law.
|
Responses:
|