Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 158
In response to
"
to settle his lawsuit against the bat manufacturer, Little League Baseball and a sporting goods chain. -- nm
"
by
Beaker
I don't see how any of them had liability in this tragedy. -- nm
Posted by
Mop (197 lbs) (aka rburriel)
Aug 22 '12, 10:01
(No message)
Responses:
... hmm. They probably have liability insurance. Maybe they decided to settle at this rate to go above and beyond for the kid? -- nm
-
Beryllium
Aug 22, 10:17
3
Progressive thinks some of the fault lies in the child who tried to catch the ball. -- nm
-
Mop (197 lbs)
Aug 22, 10:18
the insurer would have to sign off on that though. -- nm
-
Beaker
Aug 22, 10:18
or to just make it go away? -- nm
-
znufrii
Aug 22, 10:17
based on the last few paragrpahs, it sounds like the bats the store was providing were older and not within newer rules
-
Beaker
Aug 22, 10:05
they're collectable. -- nm
-
loosilu
Aug 22, 10:03
since when has that been a prerequisite for bringing a lawsuit anyway? -- nm
-
znufrii
Aug 22, 10:03
1
xactly -- nm
-
Epiphany
Aug 22, 11:10
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
