ST Alpha - "I'm honestly surprised she didn't get more, though. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 161

In response to "it is not like she does not have any $ of her own though. nm -- nm" by groiny

I'm honestly surprised she didn't get more, though. -- nm

Posted by loosilu (aka loosilu2) Aug 24 '12, 07:38

(No message)

Responses:

looking at what Tom makes, sure, but 33K a month is absurd no matter how you slice it. -- nm - groiny Aug 24, 07:41 43
- a 400K income in NYC isn't at all crazy though. - Andie Aug 24, 07:43 28
  - he's paying for her education, though -- that's likely another $100k? -- nm - amanda Aug 24, 07:45 6
    - and I don't know who's paying the nanny, but a high end full time nanny will be an easy $150k/year. -- nm - loosilu Aug 24, 07:46
    - is she at boarding school or day school? (i am mostly just curious). - Andie Aug 24, 07:46 2
      - day. the boarding school they were talking about sending her to was a sci one -- rumor is that was the last straw for katie. - amanda Aug 24, 07:47
      - day. -- nm - loosilu Aug 24, 07:46
    - at the Catholic school they're talking about, more like 40-50. -- nm - loosilu Aug 24, 07:45 1
      - thank you for correcting. my ? indicated that I didn't know. -- nm - amanda Aug 24, 07:46
  - yes, looking at it as a % of Tom's money, sure. - groiny Aug 24, 07:44 19
    - even taking Tom out of it, in Manhattan society terms it's nothing. -- nm - Andie Aug 24, 07:45 18
      - it's really not. and adding in bodyguards? I bet she has two shifts of two people, and one overnight person. that's $400k per year in manhattan. -- nm - amanda Aug 24, 07:46 16
        
        well, you know, she could , I dunno, move? nm -- nm - groiny Aug 24, 07:48 14
        
        her *job* is in new york. you could move too. I could move. -- nm - amanda Aug 24, 07:49 13
        
        this. she's trying to start up a fashion line. -- nm - loosilu Aug 24, 07:50 12
        
        right, so she has $. So we cannot look at this like the 400k is all she has. nm -- nm - groiny Aug 24, 07:51 11
        
        Suri is Tom Cruise's kid. Why should Tom not pay support at a level that other dad's pay support? -- nm - Andie Aug 24, 07:53 3
        
        I think this is the biggest thing. the judge should have awarded enough support that suri's life didn't have to change. -- nm - amanda Aug 24, 07:59 1
        
        Dave just finished payment support for his son - i assure it was a hell of a lot more than 2% of his income. -- nm - Andie Aug 24, 08:00
        
        I posted elsewhere in this trhread by mistake, but was refering to some of this. -- nm - Spawn Aug 24, 07:55
        
        It's not about how much money she has. She deserved more, IMO. -- nm - loosilu Aug 24, 07:53 6
        
        Pre Nuptual Agreement. She signed it. -- nm - Bacon Aug 24, 07:59
        
        The marraige is over, so the money is over. -- nm - Bacon Aug 24, 07:55 4
        
        you don't think he needs to pay for his child's care? interesting. -- nm - Andie Aug 24, 07:56 3
        
        She was talking about him paying her alimony. -- nm - Bacon Aug 24, 07:58 2
        
        okay, i thought you meant *all* the money is over from your statement. -- nm - Andie Aug 24, 07:59
        
        her life is different forever after being married to Tom. - loosilu Aug 24, 07:59
        
        and they genuinely need bodyguards. -- nm - loosilu Aug 24, 07:47
      - this. -- nm - loosilu Aug 24, 07:45
  - it's really not. you're not a rich person on that. -- nm - loosilu Aug 24, 07:44
- But that's his daughter and she's entitled to it, you know? -- nm - loosilu Aug 24, 07:42 13
  - she is entitled to something, somehow I doubt she needs 33k a month worth of shit. nm -- nm - groiny Aug 24, 07:43 12
    - Maybe not --- but given the massive fortune in play here....400k a year sounds low. - Will Hunting Aug 24, 07:46 9
      - Sorry, not 5% --- 2%. Child and spousal support of 2% is unreal low. -- nm - Will Hunting Aug 24, 07:48
      - child support of any nature, should be based on need. nm -- nm - groiny Aug 24, 07:47 7
        
        well, what do you tell Sur? Your dad is megarich, but you live with your mom. So, go live in your walk up apartment and try to not be jealous of - Andie Aug 24, 07:50 5
        
        and also, every time you see your dad, he will take you on a ridiculous fantasy vacation. - loosilu Aug 24, 07:54
        
        *and* need is location-based, peer-group based. suri needs vastly different things than needs a child here, say. -- nm - amanda Aug 24, 07:52
        
        life is hard, kid, get used to it. nm -- nm - groiny Aug 24, 07:52 2
        
        it's Tom's money. do you think he's being ripped off or something? -- nm - Andie Aug 24, 07:54 1
        
        no, I think when you can afford to pay 400k a year for "child support", you make too much money. nm -- nm - groiny Aug 24, 07:56
        
        We can talk "Should" as part of the hypothetical "Fixes".... -- nm - Will Hunting Aug 24, 07:49
    - it's not about what she needs. we all know no kid needs that much. -- nm - loosilu Aug 24, 07:44
    - Better to her than to the Church of Scientology or whatever crap Tom would buy for himself. -- nm - mara Aug 24, 07:44
How much did she get? -- nm - Under the Influence Aug 24, 07:41 1
- reportedly nothing. -- nm - loosilu Aug 24, 07:42

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.