In response to
"He's left with no option but to say "When we voted for that trigger, we underestimated how dumb we were""
by
Roger More
|
"The bill directly specified $917 billion of cuts over 10 years"
Posted by
ty97
Sep 10 '12, 17:47
|
I don't have the breakdown of those direct cuts yet, but believe that's what O'Donnell is talking about in the link -- that part of that 917 that impacts defense.
Those are direct cuts, part of the bill, nothing to do with success or failure of a the bipartisan panel, nothing to do with triggers.
|
Responses:
|