ST Alpha - "general sucktitude. nm -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "What were they apologizing for in each game? -- nm" by amoxy

general sucktitude. nm -- nm

Posted by groiny (aka groiny) Sep 11 '12, 11:12

(No message)

Responses:

Well, then why nothing to Arizona and San Fran? - amoxy Sep 11, 11:13 13
- because they won. -- nm - Reagen Sep 11, 11:15 11
  - so why bring more attention it. -- nm - Beaker Sep 11, 11:16 9
    - I don't follow. -- nm - Reagen Sep 11, 11:18 8
      - no need to apologise cause they won so why apologise and just open that kettle of fish to go along with the other bad calls -- nm - Beaker Sep 11, 11:19 7
        
        I'm still honestly not sure which side you're on. - Reagen Sep 11, 11:23 5
        
        no side. just a reasoning as to why they wouldn't. Why bring it backup when it didn't swing the outcome - Beaker Sep 11, 11:28 2
        
        This situation has nothing to do with replacement refs. It's been modus operandi in the league for as long as I can remember. - David Sep 11, 11:30 1
        
        ahh gotcha -- nm - Beaker Sep 11, 11:31
        
        I think he's just trying to understand. A lot of people don't realize Tuesdays are league apologies day. -- nm - David Sep 11, 11:25 1
        
        yeah there's no intended snark in my message. I just am not clear. -- nm - Reagen Sep 11, 11:26
        
        Because the NFL (and all college football conferences) always send apologies when the losing team gets jobbed. - David Sep 11, 11:21
  - Yup. -- nm - David Sep 11, 11:16
- no one likes Arizona and San Fran. nm -- nm - groiny Sep 11, 11:13

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.