ST Alpha - "It doesn't. St. Louis for no reason had the clock stopped with 2:37 to go." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "what good does that do, really? nm -- nm" by groiny

It doesn't. St. Louis for no reason had the clock stopped with 2:37 to go.

Posted by David (aka David) Sep 11 '12, 11:13

Detroit got the winning score later in that drive (arguably) thanks to the extra time.

Oakland was entitled to a final play last night since San Diego downed a punt when time expired but the replacement refs didn't know that rule.

Responses:

Ahh, I hadn't heard about the St Louis clock stoppage and didn't see the end of the Raiders game - amoxy Sep 11, 11:30
You're entitled toa play after the game ends if the other team can run out the clock effectively? -- nm - Will Hunting Sep 11, 11:19 3
- On a punt, the receiving team has to be the first one to touch the ball. - David Sep 11, 11:23 2
  - that was the other bizarre thing. - Reagen Sep 11, 11:25 1
    - RIGHT?! -- nm - David Sep 11, 11:26
The rule ignorance is baffling to me. You would think the NFL would have reps at each game in communication with the refs just for those types of - oblique Sep 11, 11:15 2
- They clearly did which is why the games were so much longer last weekend. - David Sep 11, 11:19
- this -- nm - Beaker Sep 11, 11:16

Post a message top

It doesn't. St. Louis for no reason had the clock stopped with 2:37 to go.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.