ST Alpha - "Sure is getting a lot of national coverage for a local government issue -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 163

In response to "Do presidents usually get involved with local government issues? -- nm" by CovingtonCat

Sure is getting a lot of national coverage for a local government issue -- nm

Posted by Strongbad (aka Rambler14) Sep 18 '12, 05:28

(No message)

Responses:

Lindsay Lohan gets national news coverage. Should Obama take a position on her? - CovingtonCat Sep 18, 05:39 7
- Please! I need a pardon! -- nm - LiLo Sep 18, 05:40
- Great comparison. Thanks. -- nm - Strongbad Sep 18, 05:40 5
  - Of anyone in this thread, you cannot critique comparisons. - Will Hunting Sep 18, 05:44 4
    - We've had what... 20 threads in the past 24 hours on Mitt Romney's stupidity? - Strongbad Sep 18, 05:48 2
      - I have zero problem with the thread you created. - Will Hunting Sep 18, 05:51 1
        
        My mistake. - Strongbad Sep 18, 05:54
    - [deleted]
This is one of the silliest things you've ever posted. -- nm - ty97 Sep 18, 05:30 1
- That's saying a lot. -- nm - Strongbad Sep 18, 05:34
National coverage doesn't change that the impact is and will continue to be local to Chicago. -- nm - TWuG Sep 18, 05:30 15
- So is that the WH's reasoning for not taking a position? - Strongbad Sep 18, 05:33 14
  - Dunno. States' rights, probably. -- nm - Roger More Sep 18, 05:41
  - I have no idea what the WH rationale for staying out of it is.. But its as good a rationale as you can get. -- nm - TWuG Sep 18, 05:38
  - Why should the president take a stand on a local government issue? - CovingtonCat Sep 18, 05:36 8
    - When was the last time a labor dispute got this much press coverage? - Strongbad Sep 18, 05:43 7
      - that was a local issue was well, that got as much national attention. - tRuMaN Sep 18, 07:19
      - It's a local issue. There are no national ramifications. The strike isn't in danger of spreading to other cities, doesn't involve violence, - TWuG Sep 18, 05:45 1
        
        If that's the thinking, fine. - Strongbad Sep 18, 06:14
      - Again, why should the president take a stand on a local issue? - CovingtonCat Sep 18, 05:44 3
        
        If that's the standard you want to hold him too, fine. - Strongbad Sep 18, 05:46 2
        
        No, that's the standard you're holding him to - that just because something is getting national press coverage he should take a position. -- nm - CovingtonCat Sep 18, 05:49 1
        
        "why should the president take a stand on a local issue?" -- nm - Strongbad Sep 18, 05:50
  - I doubt it is even on the WH's radar. They have diplomats being killed overseas. A local strike shouldn't be on their radar -- nm - Beaker Sep 18, 05:35 2
    - Considering it was probably the #1 issue in the news Pre-Egypt & Libya - Strongbad Sep 18, 05:36 1
      - #1 issue where? In Chicago maybe. Nationwide? Not likely -- nm - Beaker Sep 18, 05:40

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.