ST Alpha - "but that 47% shouldn't have been voting for him before this, don't you see? swearing" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "Some of the 47% he was speaking about might actually have voted for him, though. -- nm" by Spawn

but that 47% shouldn't have been voting for him before this, don't you see? swearing

Posted by amanda Sep 18 '12, 07:27

his proposed tax policies were going to fuck them over anyway and they either don't understand or choose not to listen, favoring instead to vote solely based on social issues.

so he won't lose anything. it's sad but true.

Responses:

So they should ignore social issues and vote solely on economic ones? - spamlet Sep 18, 07:59 7
- my argument is that they are voting based *solely* on social issues. anyone who's going to be - amanda Sep 18, 08:03 4
  - If you believe that both parties will screw you over equally financially, it really doesn't matter does it? -- nm - spamlet Sep 18, 08:09 2
    - if both parties will screw you over, vote for the one that will use lube. -- nm - znufrii Sep 18, 08:11
    - This is what Obama was getting at four years ago - Reagen Sep 18, 08:11
  - Don't forget one thing. Many people believe Praying will save them before the Government will. - Bacon Sep 18, 08:06
- [deleted] 1
  - word to your second paragraph. (and also to its mother.) -- nm - amanda Sep 18, 08:04
Here is the deal. It's like Congress being 17% liked. It's always the OTHER congressmen, not MINE. Government benefits in the GOP are always, THOSE - Bacon Sep 18, 07:55
like guns and religion! -- nm - Reagen Sep 18, 07:46
[deleted]

Post a message top

but that 47% shouldn't have been voting for him before this, don't you see? swearing

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.