Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 153
(spoiler)
Posted by
spamlet
Sep 19 '12, 14:29
Sproles. People are screaming for him to be added as WR even though he only lines up as RB.
Show Spoilers
Responses:
[deleted]
4
I think my guess is the reasning for it.
-
the wrong element, bad guy
Sep 19, 14:32
1
Right, they went with RB for McCluster and don't remove during the year (at least at ESPN). He'll be WR only next year. -- nm
-
spamlet
Sep 19, 14:33
Both Mondays, one of the podcasts I listen to from ESPN has clearly stated they won't move him.
-
spamlet
Sep 19, 14:31
1
ESPN really doesn't like multiple positio eligibility in football.
-
the wrong element, bad guy
Sep 19, 14:35
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.